Chapter 8: Five Women

Claire called back at 3 p.m.
"I spoke to my contact at the paper," she said.
"They want to talk to you."
"When?"
"Tomorrow, if you're willing.
They've been building something on Patton for eight months.
They have three sources already.
They need someone on the record."
"On the record," I said.
"With your name.
Your account.
The recording." A pause.
"I know that's a lot to ask.
You have a six-week-old.
You went to the grocery store to buy bread."
"I know what I went to buy," I said.
"I know you do.
I just want you to understand what you'd be walking into.
Once your name is in the paper, it doesn't come back out."
I looked across the room.
Dan was sitting on the couch with Nora on his chest, exactly where he'd been when I left for the store that morning.
He was reading something on his phone.
He looked up and met my eyes.
I didn't need to say anything.
He nodded once.
"Set up the meeting," I said.
The reporter's name was Tom Ashby.
He was younger than I expected — mid-thirties, quiet, with a notepad he barely looked at because he was watching my face instead.
He came to the house the next morning and sat at the kitchen table with a recorder between us.
He asked me to start from the beginning.
I did.
He didn't react much while I talked.
He wrote a few things.
He asked two clarifying questions.
When I finished, he looked at his notepad for a moment.
"Can I play you something?" he said.
He took out his phone and opened an audio file.
A woman's voice — older than mine, steadier, like someone who had practiced being steady.
*He told me I was being emotional.
He said to go home and let my husband handle it.
And when I filed the complaint, I got a letter three weeks later saying it had been reviewed and closed.
I never spoke to anyone.
I never got a hearing.
The letter had his signature on it.*
Tom stopped the recording.
"That's the woman from the zoning complaint," he said.
"Three years ago."
"You have her on record?" I said.
"Since last month.
We also have a woman from a neighborhood association meeting in 2022.
A woman from a school board public comment session in 2021.
And a woman who attended one of his campaign fundraisers in 2019 and says he told her she was —" he checked his notes — "'drawing attention to herself' when she stood up to ask a question."
I counted silently.
With me, that was five.
The same number Maria had.
"Are they the same women who contacted Maria?" I said.
"Some overlap.
Some new." He set the notepad down.
"We've been trying to find someone willing to go on record for eight months.
The others were afraid of exactly what he did to you — the calls, the permit hints, the pressure."
"He did it to them too?"
"Not always permits.
One woman's husband had a business license renewal pending.
Another had a daughter applying for a position on a city advisory board." He said it plainly, like he'd said it before.
"He finds the thing that matters most and he mentions it.
Casually.
Like he's just describing how things work."
Dan's hand came flat on the table.
"He's been doing this for years," Dan said.
"We believe so," Tom said.
"But belief isn't a story.
Documentation is."
He looked at me.
"The recording you have," he said.
"The one from the phone call.
That's documentation."
"You can have it," I said.
"And you'll go on record."
"Yes."
Tom picked up his notepad again.
"Then I think we have a story," he said.
He left an hour later.
I stood at the front door and watched his car pull away and thought about a woman I'd never met, sitting somewhere in this city, who had filed a formal complaint three years ago and received a letter with his signature on it telling her it was closed.
She had done everything right.
She had used the system.
And the system had handed it back to him.
Maria texted while I was still standing at the door.
*He posted something.
On his official page.*
I opened it.
A statement, three paragraphs, posted to his council profile.
*I want to address the recent social media discussion regarding an interaction I had at a local grocery store.
I regret that my words were received in a hurtful way.
It was never my intention to cause distress.
I have dedicated fifteen years to serving this community and I remain committed to doing so with integrity and respect for all residents.*
He had not said what he said.
He had not said my name.
He had not mentioned the texts.
Or the calls.
Or the permits.
He had said his words were *received* in a hurtful way.
I read it twice.
Then I forwarded it to Claire and Tom and typed one line to Maria.
*He's not sorry.
He's managing.*
Her reply came back in four seconds.
May you like
*I know.
The comments on his post are not going the way he hoped.*